The Right to Decide: New Report Highlights Why Companies Need to Operate with Free, Prior and Informed Consent of Indigenous Peoples
Amazon Watch Builds Case for FPIC and Gives Recommendations to Investors
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE | February 3, 2011
For more information, contact:
Caroline Bennett, 415-487-9600 x327, email@example.com
Gregor MacLennan, 415-487-9600 x306 / 415-395-6734, firstname.lastname@example.org
San Francisco, CA – Industrial resource extraction is posing grave threats to the survival of indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin and there are serious moral, legal and financial reasons for corporations to stem the tide of abuse and respect indigenous peoples' rights, Amazon Watch said in a briefing paper released today.
The paper, entitled The Right to Decide: The Importance of Respecting Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), makes the strong case that respecting indigenous peoples' rights is not just a moral imperative, but also a business necessity for corporations to avoid financial risk, reputational damage, divestment campaigns, operational delays due to social unrest, multi-billion dollar legal liabilities, and loss of license to operate.
In the wake of recent U.S. endorsement of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), and as the historic multi-billion dollar lawsuit against Chevron for massive environmental contamination in Ecuador is set for a ruling, Amazon Watch is urging large-scale institutional investors and socially responsible investors to closely monitor corporate behavior in indigenous territory and demand that corporations only operate where they have the free, prior and informed consent of any indigenous peoples potentially affected by their operations.
"As resource extraction increasingly moves into socially and environmentally fragile areas of the world, like the Amazon rainforest, companies must take affirmative steps to avoid violating indigenous peoples' rights,"stated Gregor MacLennan, Peru Program Coordinator of Amazon Watch. "This report demonstrates that from both a human rights and a business perspective, companies should only operate with the free, prior and informed consent of any affected indigenous peoples."
While states traditionally bear responsibility to protect human rights, companies have an independent responsibility to respect them and to "do no harm." The report demonstrates that to avoid complicity in human rights abuses and related legal, financial and reputational harms, companies need policies and due diligence to ensure their operations do not violate indigenous rights, beginning with a clear commitment to respect FPIC.
"The oil industry, for one, is in its infancy when it comes to developing and implementing policies to respect indigenous rights,"said Mitch Anderson, Corporate Campaigns Director for Amazon Watch. "Although some companies, such as Talisman Energy, are taking cautious steps forward, other companies, such as Chevron, appear to be burying their heads in the sand."
As the paper outlines, FPIC is an internationally recognized norm, designed to ensure respect for indigenous peoples' right to self-determination, the right to decide their own future. The paper defines FPIC as "consent that is given freely, by people fully informed of the consequences, prior to any decision being made, and according to their own decision-making processes.”