Organizations Worldwide Call on Brazil to Respect IACHR Resolution | Amazon Watch
Amazon Watch

Organizations Worldwide Call on Brazil to Respect a Resolution from Inter-American Commission to Suspend the Belo Monte Dam

May 6, 2011 | Campaign Update

Honorable Dilma Vana Rousseff

President of the Federative Republic of Brazil

Brasilia, DF, Brazil

Tel: (+55-61) 3411-1200 / 3411-1201

Fax: (+55-61) 3411-2222

Email: gabinetepessoal@presidencia.gov.br, casacivil@planalto.gov.br

 

Dear President Rousseff,

We are writing to express our deep concerns regarding the implementation of the precautionary measures (MC-382-10[1]) requested by the Interamerican Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) on April 1st 2011 to safeguard the rights of indigenous peoples – including groups living in voluntary isolation – threatened by the construction of the Belo Monte Hydroelectric Dam Complex in the Amazonian state of Pará. We are also deeply distressed by your government’s recent reaction to withdraw its candidate for Commissioner in 2012, and according to Brazilian media,[2] threatening to pull funding from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

If implemented, both these decisions will weaken the respect for human rights and environmental protection in Brazil and the Americas and tarnish the countries’ reputation as a leader in the region. Therefore we respectfully request that the Brazilian government comply with the IACHR resolution and abstain of the intention to withdraw funding from the OAS.
As organizations that work on human rights issues, we are interested to see that the Brazilian government respects the decision from such an important body for the protection of human rights in the OAS. This is especially crucial given Brazil’s binding commitments under both the American Declaration and Convention of Human Rights to guarantee the human rights of all people in its jurisdiction.

In November 2010, local communities and grassroots and civil society organizations in Brazil, led by the Movimento Xingu Vivo para Sempre, filed a request for precautionary measures with the IACHR. That request provides a well-documented and in-depth analysis of problems related to the approval of the Belo Monte Dam Complex, with particular emphasis on the lack of free, prior and informed consultations and consent among indigenous peoples. Indigenous consultation is mandated by article 231 of the Brazilian Constitution, as well as international agreements including Convention 169 of the International Labor Organization and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

After carefully reviewing the petition presented by Brazilian civil society organizations, the IACHR provided an opportunity for the federal government to submit a written response, which occurred in March 2011. Only after careful analysis of this response did the Commission conclude that the government had not taken adequate steps to ensure the human rights of indigenous communities affected by the Belo Monte Dam Complex, justifying a request for precautionary measures. As such, we firmly believe that the decision of the Commission was properly grounded and informed, taking into full account the arguments of the Brazilian government.

The decision of the IACHR is clearly supported by other Brazilian institutions. On April 7th 2011, the Human Rights Commission of the Brazilian House of Representatives approved a resolution supporting the decision of the IACHR[3]. The Federal Public Prosecutors’ Office (MPF) has also filed many civil lawsuits against the project that are all indefinitely in the Brazilian judicial system, making the project practically a fait accompli. Various reports from Brazilian federal agencies, scientists, experts, the MPF, and the Brazilian Council for the Defense of Human Rights (CDDPH),[4] all conclusively demonstrate that the planning and concession of licenses of the Belo Monte Dam Complex has disregarded relevant environmental and human rights legislation, including the right of indigenous peoples to free, informed and informed consent.

Given the support for the IACHR’s decision, we feel the federal government’s is extreme, uncalled for, and dangerous for the protection of human rights in the Americas. On April 30th, the media published that Brazilian government threatened to cut funding to the Commission as a response to the IACHR decision.[5] This unprecedented reaction follows unilateral measures taken earlier to withdraw its candidate for a new Commissioner on the IACHR. We strongly believe that this reaction jeopardizes not only the rights and well-being of indigenous peoples in the Xingu Basin, but also the independence and effectiveness of important bodies such as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the respect for the Rule of Law in the region.
Brazil should rise to fulfill its reputation as a global leader in meeting the challenges of sustainable development in the 21st century, including its status as host country to the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in 2012. However, the government’s recent responses threaten to tarnish its global status as a country committed to multilateralism and its institutions.

Although Brazil needs to continue developing its economy, this cannot happen at the expense of human rights and the environment. There exists numerous alternatives to projects such as Belo Monte and there are many measures available to prevent the serious and irreparable social and environmental harms that this project can cause. We trust that the Brazilian government is fully capable of implementing these.

Given the above considerations, we respectfully request that your government reconsider its position regarding implementation of the IACHR precautionary measures MC-382-10 and retract its threats to the Commission. These steps will help ensure full recognition of indigenous peoples’ rights as guaranteed by the Brazilian Constitution and international law, and also respect for multilateral institutions such as the Interamerican Commission of Human Rights and the OAS.

Thank you very much your attention to this urgent matter. We look forward to hearing a response at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely,

  1. Abogadas y Abogados para la Justicia y los Derechos Humanos
    Carmen Herrera
  2. Acción Solidaria en VIH/Sida
    Feliciano Reina
  3. Amazon Watch – USA
    Atossa Soltani
  4. Asociación Paz y Esperanza
    Germán Vargas
  5. Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos (Aprodeh) – Perú
    Francisco Soberón Garrido
  6. Asociación Servicios Educativos Rurales (SER) – Perú
    Paulo Vilca
  7. Bank Information Center President Rousseff USA
    Paulina Garrido
  8. Bianca Jagger Human Rights Foundation
    Bianca Jagger
  9. Center for Biological Diversity – USA
    Rose Braz
  10. Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) – USA
    Kristen Genovese
  11. Centro Amazónico de Antropología y Aplicación Práctica (CAAAP)
    Ada Chuecas
  12. Centro de Derechos y Desarrollo (CEDAL) – Perú
    Dr. Francisco Ercilio Moura
  13. Centro de Documentación en Derechos Humanos “Segundo Montes Mozo S.J.” (CSMM)
    Susana Peñafiel A.
  14. Centro de Políticas Públicas y Derechos Humanos – Perú
    Javier Mujica
  15. Centro para la Sostenibilidad Ambiental, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia – Perú
    Ernesto F. Ráez-Luna
  16. Centro Regional de Derechos Humanos y Justicia de Género – Santiago
    Carolina Carrera Ferrer
  17. Colectiva de Mujeres Hondureñas (CODEMUH) – Honduras
    María Luisa Relagado
  18. Colectivo de Abogados Jose Alvear Restrepo (CCAJAR) – Colombia
    Jomary Ortegón Osorio
  19. Comisión Colombiana de Juristas – Colombia
    Camilo Mejía Gómez
  20. Comisión de Derechos Humanos (Comisedh) – Peru
    Miguel Huerta
  21. Comisión de Solidaridad, Desarrollo y Justicia (Cosdej)
    Norbel Mondragón
  22. Comisión Ecuménica de Derechos Humanos (CEDHU) – Ecuador
    Hna. Elsie Monge
  23. Comisión Intereclesial de Justicia y Paz – Colombia
    Danilo Rueda, Liliana Ávila
  24. Comisión de Justicia Social de Chimbote – Peru
    Silvia Alayo
  25. Comité de Familiares de las Víctimas de los sucesos ocurridos entre el 27 de febrero y los primeros días de marzo de 1989 (COFAVIC)
  26. Committee of Loretto Community – USA
    Valeria Novak
  27. Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos (CNDH)
    Rocío Silva Santisteban
  28. Corporación para la Defensa y Promoción de los Derechos Humanos Reiniciar – Colombia
    Jahel Quiroga Carillo
  29. Corporate Ethics International- USA
    Michael Marx
  30. DC Friends of the MST – USA
    Lindsay Hughes
  31. Department of Zoology of the University of British Colombia – Canada
    Dr. David Suzuki
  32. Disciples Justice Action Network – USA
    Rev. Ken Broker
  33. Due Process of Law Foundation – USA
    Katya Salazar
  34. EarthWorks – USA
    Jennifer Krill
  35. Environmental Defender Law Center (EDLC) – USA
    Fernanda Venzon
  36. Espacio Público de Venezuela – Venezuela
    Carlos Correa
  37. FERN – UK
    Jutta Jill
  38. Free the Slaves – USA
    Indika Samarawickreme
  39. Friends of Earth – Germany
    Lutz Fahser
  40. Friends of Earth – Sweden
    Anna-Karin Feragen
  41. Friends of Earth – USA
    Erich Pica
  42. Forest Peoples Programme – UK
    Vanessa Jimenez
  43. Forum Ökologie and Papier – Germany
    Evelyn Schönheit
  44. Fundación Ecuménica para el Desarrollo y la Paz (FEDEPAZ)
    David Velasco
  45. Fundación Étnica integral La fei – Republica Dominicana
    Willian Charpantier
  46. Fundación para la Justicia y la Defensa de los Derechos Humanos (FUNJUDEH) – Guatemala
    Lic. Oswaldo Enríquez C.
  47. Global Exchange – USA
    Carleen Pickard
  48. Guatemala Human Rights Commission – USA
    Amanda Martin
  49. Grupo de Formación e Intervención para el Desarrollo Sostenible (Grufides)
    Mirtha Vasquez
  50. Grupo de Mujeres de San Cristóbal de las Casas, A. C – México
    Martha Figueroa Mier
  51. Guatemala Human Rights Commission – USA
    Amanda Martin
  52. Indigenous Communities and Conserved Areas Consortium – Switzerland
    Dr. Grazia Borrini-Feyerabend
  53. Indigenous Environment Network – USA
    Tom B.K. Goldtooth
  54. Indigenous Peoples International Centre for Policy Research and Education – Philippines
    Joji Carino
  55. Instituto de Defensa Legal (IDL)
    Carlos Rivera
  56. Instituto de Derechos Humanos de la Universidad Centroamericana – El Salvador
    Benjamín Cuéllar
  57. Instituto de Estudios Legales y Sociales del Uruguay (IELSUR) – Uruguay
    Jorge Pan
  58. Instituto Nacional para la Paz (Irepaz) – Perú
    Nidia Alegria
  59. International Accountability Project – USA
    Joanna Levitt
  60. International Rivers
    Aviva Imhof
  61. Land is Life – USA
    Brian Keane
  62. Latvian Ornithological Society – Latvia
    Viesturs Kerus
  63. Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns – USA
    David Kane
  64. Rainforest Action Network – USA
    Bill Barclay
  65. Rainforest Foundation US – USA
    Suzanne Pelletier
  66. Rainforest Information Center – Australia
    John Seed
  67. The Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights – USA
    Marselha Goncalves-Margerin
  68. Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum [PFF] – Pakistán
    Saeed Baloch
  69. Pro REGENWALD – Germany
    Simone Hörner
  70. Provea – Venezuela
    Marino Alvarado Betancourt
  71. Sierra Club – USA
    Rachel Ackoff
  72. Sinergia, Asociación Venezolana de Organizaciones de Sociedad Civil
  73. Survival International – UK
    Fiona Watson
  74. Vicaría de Derechos Humanos – Caracas
    Jose Gregorio Guarenas
  75. Vicaría de Sicuani – Cusco
    Ruth Luque
  76. Vicariato Apostólico San Jose del Amazonas – San José del Amazonas
    Monseñor Campos Vicariato
  77. World Rainforest Movement – Uruguay
    Ana Filippini

c.c. Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, cidhoea@oas.org

PLEASE SHARE

Short URL

Donate

Amazon Watch is building on more than 25 years of radical and effective solidarity with Indigenous peoples across the Amazon Basin.

DONATE NOW

TAKE ACTION

Defend Amazonian Earth Defenders!

TAKE ACTION

Stay Informed

Receive the Eye on the Amazon in your Inbox! We'll never share your info with anyone else, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Subscribe